Q 2. Do you think Griffin misused his
discovery out of compulsion or do you think that he did all of his illegal
activities by nature? Explain your point of view on either of the above
statements supporting with examples.
Ans. Griffin was doubtlessly a brilliant
scientist and by dint of his continuous hard work for years he was able to make
a human body invisible.
But he
commits several illegal activities which we come to know from the text. We are
to conclude whether he did those activities by nature or out of compulsion.
Let’s first
see the main activities that can be termed as illegal. He set on fire the house
he lived. He entered the London store and ate some food stuff to satisfy his
hunger and passed night there. He could have run with the clothes but he had to
throw them to make himself invisible.
Then he
entered a theatrical company, put on a mask, dark glasses, grayish whiskers and
a wig. He also stole some money from there. He had to hit the shop-keeper and
by tying him with a sheet, he ran away from there.
In Iping
also, he stole money from the clergyman’s desk. He also injured Jaffers the
police constable and thrashed others.
He also
committed murders, one of Col. Adye and the other is of Mr. Wicksteed.
If we say he
stole money because he was compelled to do so because he had no money; if we
say he burnt the house because the owner of the house could have come to know
about his equipments and plans; if we say he was compelled to murder Col. Adye
and Wicksteed to defend himself; we cannot defend him on these grounds. Similarly
other examples can be quoted to prove that he did all out of compulsion.
But breaking
law is an illegal activity whether done out of ignorance or compulsion.
We cannot
defend Griffin in any way. Some of his violent activities were also done because
he was a man of short temper and violent nature.
Thanks sir
ReplyDelete